When to Operate in Aortic Stenosis: Timing, Symptoms, and Considerations for Intervention
An article written by Dr Edward Leatham, Consultant Cardiologist
Tags: Aortic stenosis, AVR, TAVI, NH1 search website using Tags to find related stories
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive heart condition where the aortic valve narrows, restricting blood flow from the heart to the rest of the body. This condition primarily affects older adults and can significantly impact quality of life and survival. A critical decision in the management of aortic stenosis is determining the right time for intervention, particularly in older individuals who may otherwise have a good life expectancy. Understanding the clinical markers of disease progression, alongside the options for treatment, is vital for patients and healthcare providers alike.
In this article, we will explore when to operate in aortic stenosis, focusing on the role of symptoms, the importance of monitoring disease progression, and the benefits of early intervention. We will also outline the key health metrics for patients to track and offer guidance on the referral process to specialist heart services.
The Importance of Timing in Aortic Stenosis
The timing of intervention in aortic stenosis is critical. Delaying surgery or transcatheter procedures until symptoms become severe or complications arise can lead to poorer outcomes. Conversely, intervening too early may expose patients to unnecessary procedural risks. For exceptionally fit individuals aged 75-85, timely intervention can be particularly advantageous, as they may tolerate surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) better than expected for their age. In these cases, earlier treatment may prevent irreversible damage to the heart and reduce the risks associated with waiting until the disease progresses further.
Key Reasons for Intervention
Two primary factors typically guide the decision to intervene in aortic stenosis:
1. Patient Symptoms
Symptomatic aortic stenosis is the most straightforward indication for intervention. Symptoms such as lightheadedness, syncope (blacking out), chest tightness (angina), and breathlessness on exertion reflect the significant impact of the condition on cardiac output and overall health. These symptoms often indicate advanced disease requiring prompt treatment.
2. Progressive Stenosis in Asymptomatic Patients
In some cases, patients may not exhibit overt symptoms, but imaging studies reveal rapidly worsening valve narrowing. For older adults with minimal comorbidities and otherwise good life expectancy, earlier intervention may reduce the risk of sudden complications, such as heart failure or arrhythmias. Furthermore, newer surgical and transcatheter options allow for a tailored approach based on the patient’s individual risk profile.
Recognising Symptoms of Aortic Stenosis
It is essential for individuals with aortic stenosis to be aware of the warning signs that may indicate their condition is worsening and requires medical attention.
Symptoms Indicative of Aortic Stenosis
- Lightheadedness: A common early symptom, often due to reduced blood flow to the brain.
- Syncope (Blacking Out): Frequently occurs during exertion and indicates severe stenosis.
- Chest Tightness (Angina): A result of increased workload on the left ventricle due to valve narrowing.
- Breathlessness on Exertion: A sign of reduced cardiac reserve and potential heart failure.
Symptoms that are unlikely to be related to Aortic Stenosis
- Chest pain or dizziness occurring while at rest.
- Syncope that is not associated with physical activity.
Patients experiencing these symptoms should undergo a thorough evaluation to determine whether their symptoms are related to aortic stenosis or another condition.
Key Health Metrics for Patients with Aortic Stenosis
Regular monitoring is important for tracking the progression of aortic stenosis and determining the optimal timing for intervention. The following metrics should be assessed routinely, you will note that some of these can be arranged via your GP, as long as someone looks at the trends. At SCVC, we offer annual care plans for valve patients where we design a combination of tests (including those done by GP) and use patient apps and AI to track an changes, which can then lead to an alert and senior clinical review.
1. Annual Blood Tests
- B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP): High levels suggest increased heart strain and may indicate worsening disease.
- Full Blood Count: To detect conditions such as anaemia, which can exacerbate symptoms.
- Kidney Function Tests (eGFR): To assess suitability for intervention and monitor overall health.
2. Blood Pressure Monitoring
Hypertension adds an additional burden to the heart and may worsen the impact of aortic stenosis.
3. Echocardiographic Assessments
- Peak and Mean Aortic Velocities (via CW Doppler): Key indicators of stenosis severity.
- Ejection Fraction (EF%): Declining EF indicates compromised heart function.
- Estimated Aortic Valve Area (AVA): Helps determine disease severity and progression.
For stable cases, echocardiography should be performed every two years. In patients with rapid disease progression or worsening symptoms, annual imaging may be necessary.
4. Functional Capacity Tests
A simple benchmark such as walking a specific route without stopping (e.g., Guildford High Street) can provide practical insight into a patient’s functional status.
Referral and Multidisciplinary Care
Every patient with aortic stenosis should be managed by a cardiology service with access to advanced imaging and a multidisciplinary Heart Team. This team-based approach ensures that decisions about the timing and type of intervention are tailored to the individual patient’s needs and circumstances.
Key Features of a Multidisciplinary Heart Team
- Access to Advanced Imaging: Including transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), cardiac CT, and Doppler studies.
- Comprehensive Team Composition: Cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, imaging specialists, and interventional cardiologists work together to assess the patient.
- Treatment Planning: Collaboration to decide between SAVR and TAVI, considering factors such as frailty, comorbidities, and long-term prognosis.
This approach is particularly important for older patients, who may not always be offered surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) despite evidence that it can provide better durability and outcomes compared to TAVI in certain cases.
SAVR vs TAVI: Choosing the Right Intervention
For patients aged 75-85, the choice between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) depends on their overall health, surgical risk, and expected longevity.
1. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR)
- Benefits: Provides excellent durability and fewer long-term reinterventions compared to TAVI.
- Minimally Invasive Options: Advanced techniques can reduce recovery times and procedural risks.
- Ideal Candidates: Fit older adults with good surgical tolerance and life expectancy.
2. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
- Benefits: A less invasive procedure with shorter recovery time.
- Limitations: Valve durability may be lower, particularly for younger or more active patients.
- Ideal Candidates: Those at high surgical risk or with significant comorbidities.
For exceptionally fit individuals in their 80s, SAVR may still represent a lower-risk, longer-lasting solution compared to TAVI. This underscores the importance of comprehensive evaluation by a multidisciplinary team.
Patient Education and Awareness
Empowering patients to understand their condition and participate actively in their care is crucial for achieving optimal outcomes.
What Every Patient with Aortic Stenosis Should Know
- Symptoms to Monitor: Recognise early warning signs such as lightheadedness, breathlessness on exertion, and chest tightness.
- Routine Monitoring: Stay on top of annual blood tests, echocardiograms, and functional assessments.
- The Importance of Specialist Referral: Ensure that all treatment options, including SAVR and TAVI, are considered by a multidisciplinary Heart Team.
Proactive management and informed decision-making can significantly improve both quality of life and survival.
Conclusion
The timing of intervention in aortic stenosis is a critical decision requiring a balance between preventing irreversible damage to the heart and avoiding unnecessary procedural risks. For older adults, particularly those aged 75-85 who remain fit and active, early intervention with SAVR or TAVI can significantly enhance quality of life and long-term outcomes.
Recognising symptoms, monitoring key health metrics, and seeking timely specialist care are essential for managing this condition effectively. With the support of a multidisciplinary Heart Team, patients can receive personalised treatment that aligns with their health needs and goals, ensuring the best possible outcomes for their future.
Other related articles
- Aortic stenosis
The Naked Heart is an educational project owned and operated by Dr Edward Leatham. It comprises a series of blog articles, videos and reels distributed on Tiktok, Youtube and Instagram aimed to help educate both patients and healthcare professionals about cardiology related issues.
If you would like to receive email notification each week from the Naked Heart, follow me on social media or please feel free to subscribe to the Naked Heart email notifications here
