Skip to main content

Providing independent clinical excellence since 2005

The SCVC Blog

Cardiovascular care news and articles from our expert team

If You’ve Had a Stent, Check Your Waist

Posted on Friday December 19, 2025 in Metabolic Health

An article written by Dr Edward Leatham, Consultant Cardiologist     © 2025 E.Leatham

Tags: VAT, Metabolic Health, Stent search website using Tags to find related stories.

When a coronary stent is implanted, the immediate problem—an obstructed artery—is treated. Blood flow improves, symptoms often settle, and the procedure is labelled a success. But a stent treats a local narrowing, not the systemic biology that caused it. For some patients, that biology increases the risk of the artery narrowing again—a process known as in-stent restenosis (ISR).

One of the most important and overlooked contributors to ISR is metabolic health, particularly insulin resistance driven by visceral fat.


In-stent restenosis: a biological response, not a technical failure

ISR is not simply scar tissue. It represents an exaggerated vascular healing response to arterial injury, characterised by:

  • Endothelial dysfunction
  • Inflammation
  • Migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells
  • Extracellular matrix deposition

Despite major advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology, ISR still occurs—especially in certain biological states¹².

One group has consistently higher risk across all stent eras: patients with diabetes³,⁴.


Diabetes and ISR: a consistent association

Large registries and pathological studies show that patients with diabetes have:

  • Higher rates of ISR
  • Greater neointimal hyperplasia
  • Increased need for repeat revascularisation

Classic intravascular ultrasound studies demonstrated that the excess restenosis seen in diabetes is due to exaggerated intimal growth, rather than stent under-expansion or recoil⁵.

Importantly, this increased risk persists even with modern DES, indicating that diabetes reflects an underlying biological driver rather than a stent-related issue⁶.


Insulin resistance: the problem often starts earlier

Diabetes is the visible end-stage. The process usually begins years earlier with insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia.

This matters because insulin is not just a glucose-lowering hormone—it is also a growth and repair signal within the vascular wall.

Clinical studies have shown that:

  • Higher fasting insulin levels are associated with ISR
  • Insulin resistance (measured by HOMA-IR) independently predicts restenosis after coronary stenting, even in non-diabetic patients⁷
  • Patients who develop ISR after DES implantation have significantly higher insulin resistance indices than those who do not⁸

These findings suggest that the artery is responding to injury in a pro-proliferative metabolic environment.


Why insulin resistance promotes restenosis

ISR is driven largely by vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) behaviour. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia amplify this process by:

  • Stimulating VSMC proliferation and migration
  • Reducing nitric oxide bioavailability
  • Promoting inflammation and oxidative stress
  • Impairing normal endothelial repair

Experimental work supports causality: animal models lacking insulin receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells develop less intimal hyperplasia after vascular injury, directly implicating insulin signalling in restenosis biology⁹.


Waist size reveals the real risk: visceral fat

Many patients with insulin resistance do not appear “obese” by BMI standards. The key issue is where fat is stored.

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT)—fat stored deep around the organs—is:

  • Highly metabolically active
  • Strongly linked to insulin resistance
  • Pro-inflammatory
  • Associated with endothelial dysfunction and accelerated atherosclerosis¹⁰

A simple screening tool is waist-to-height ratio:

Waist circumference ÷ height
A ratio >0.5 suggests excess visceral fat¹¹

For patients with a history of stenting, this measurement provides critical information that cholesterol and glucose tests may miss.


Confirmed visceral fat reframes risk after stenting

When imaging (CT, DEXA, MRI) or consistent anthropometric data confirm high VAT, several things become likely:

  • Insulin resistance is present
  • Insulin levels are often elevated despite “normal” glucose
  • The vascular system is exposed to a pro-healing, pro-proliferative environment

This helps explain why some patients experience ISR or progressive coronary disease despite optimal procedural results and guideline-based therapy.


Why GLP-1 mimetics are relevant after a stent

GLP-1 receptor agonists are often discussed as weight-loss drugs. In cardiovascular medicine, that framing is incomplete.

GLP-1 mimetics:

  • Preferentially reduce visceral fat
  • Improve insulin sensitivity
  • Lower circulating insulin levels
  • Improve endothelial function
  • Reduce systemic inflammation
  • Reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in large outcome trials¹,²,¹³

Although trials have not been designed specifically with ISR as a primary endpoint, the biological rationale is strong: reducing visceral fat and insulin resistance addresses the upstream drivers of restenosis.

This mirrors earlier preventive strategies—such as statins—where mechanistic benefit preceded formal ISR-specific trial endpoints.


What this means for patients who’ve had a stent

If you have had a coronary stent:

  1. Measure your waist
  2. Divide it by your height
  3. If the result is >0.5, ask what this means for your heart

If visceral fat is confirmed, management should extend beyond antiplatelets and cholesterol lowering. Alongside lifestyle change, targeting insulin resistance and VAT—including consideration of GLP-1 therapy—may reduce future risk.


The key message

  • A stent treats an artery, not metabolism
  • Diabetes increases restenosis risk—but insulin resistance comes first
  • Visceral fat is a major driver and is often hidden
  • Waist-to-height ratio is a powerful, simple screening tool
  • In selected patients, GLP-1 mimetics represent preventive cardiovascular therapy, not cosmetic weight loss

If you’ve had a stent, checking your waist may be one of the most important follow-up steps you take.


References

  1. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials. Circulation. 2007;115:2344–2351.
  2. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 1999;100:1872–1878.
  3. Kip KE, Faxon DP, Detre KM, et al. Coronary angioplasty in diabetic patients. Circulation. 1996;94:1818–1825.
  4. Paramasivam G, Devasia T, Rao MS. In-stent restenosis in diabetes mellitus. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2020;48:156–164.
  5. Kornowski R, Mintz GS, Kent KM, et al. Increased restenosis in diabetes is due to exaggerated intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 1997;95:1366–1369.
  6. Yahagi K, Kolodgie FD, Otsuka F, et al. Pathophysiology of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1556–1571.
  7. Nishio K, Shigemitsu M, Kusuyama T, et al. Insulin resistance as a predictor for restenosis after coronary stenting. Int J Cardiol. 2005;103:128–134.
  8. Zhao LP, Xu WT, Wang L, et al. Influence of insulin resistance on in-stent restenosis after DES implantation. Coron Artery Dis. 2015;26:5–10.
  9. Rask-Madsen C, Li Q, Freund B, et al. Loss of insulin signaling in vascular smooth muscle accelerates injury-induced intimal hyperplasia. Nat Med. 2010;16:746–752.
  10. Després JP. Body fat distribution and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2012;126:1301–1313.
  11. Ashwell M, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio as an early health risk indicator. Nutr Bull. 2016;41:70–80.
  12. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311–322.
  13. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:989–1002.

Technical papers: located in Dr Leatham’s “VAT Trap” Digital Companion and Resources

  1. Why So Many PCSK9 Mutations Exist — Evolution, Immunity, and Trade-Offs
  2. Bradford Hill’s Criteria for Causation Applied to LDL Cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease
  3. A Bradford Hill Appraisal of Raised Visceral Adipose Tissue and Coronary Heart Disease:
  4. Debate: This House Believes That LDL Cholesterol Is a Bystander — Not a Cause — of Coronary Heart Disease

Related posts

  1. Cholesterol, LDL, and what we learnt from PCSK9 mutations in familial hypercholesterolaemia
  2. So what does determine your LDL (‘bad’) Cholesterol?
  3. LDL: the lower the better
  4. How to Lose Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT) and Improve Metabolic Health: A Guide to Sustainable Weight Loss
  5. Visceral Fat, Mitochondria, and the Energy Trap: Why We Store Fat Where We Shouldn’t
  6. Why everyone is talking about VAT

More articles for you

Carbohydrate Sensitive Phenotype (CSP): Precursor of the Metabolic Syndrome?

Carbohydrate Sensitive Phenotype (CSP) is not a diagnosis of diabetes or obesity. Rather, it’s a biologically driven pattern of visceral fat accumulation and carbohydrate intolerance which is highly prevalent in those with a raised waist-to-height ratio (WHtR > 0.5), triggered by aging, Western-style diet and lifestyle. More importantly, CSP gives individuals a name for their experience—one that invites support instead of judgement, and allows them to engage with food and health choices free from social shame.